That’s just not what the Beats sound is about. Beats is taking its Solo line wireless, with a new set of Bluetooth cans that match the wired Solo2 almost exactly in terms of external design. The new Beats Solo2 Wireless headphones (MSRP $299.95) are the Bluetooth-powered, wire-optional version of the company's signature Solo series, and the follow-up to the Beats Solo2 on-ear headphones from a couple years ago. Today I’ll be reviewing the Bluetooth version of the revised Beats, and let me start off by saying that they are a gigantic improvement over the originals. They have a very light touch, where the Beats Solo 2 Wireless aren’t afraid to apply a kit of pressure. Sure, you can get better-sounding cans for this price, but with Beats you're ultimately paying for fashion. Our Verdict. We procured the Beats Solo 3 wireless headphones on our own (they were on sale…yay!) smartphones laptops tablets News. There are multiple color options available … The Beats Solo2 Wireless doesn't quite get there. As long as you don’t mind a tighter fit and don’t wear glasses, they’re fairly comfortable too. Like pretty much every other pair of Beats headphones, the wireless Solo2s will draw opinions from lovers and haters alike; you're either on board with the … The Beats Solo 2 Wireless is a headphone I’ve always been curious to try. Enjoy! Expensive; doesn't sound quite as good as the Bose SoundLink On-Ear Bluetooth, which costs $50 less. The Beats Solo3 Wireless is an old set of headphones but still works reliably well with iPhones, due to W1 chip integration and AAC support. The glossy plastic of the Beats Solo 2 Wireless is not going to be to everyone’s taste, but complete their mission statement with verve. A good Bluetooth headphone is one that sounds like a good wired headphone and the Solo 2 Wireless succeeds in this regard, retaining many of the qualities of the wired Solo 2. I usually don't spend a lot of time comparing an on-ear headphone to an over-ear model, but I suspect a lot of people will be trying to decide between the more compact Solo 2 Wireless and the larger Studio Wireless. When it comes to sound quality, Beats means Bass. So why am I not quite as enamored with the Solo2 Wireless, which looks similar to its wired sibling but weighs slightly more due to some extra electronic components and rechargeable battery built into the headphone? We use industry standard tests in order to compare features properly. The advantage of Solo3 is its classic Beats design and attractive finish on the headphone exterior. The wireless feature alone should really divide buyers into two separate camps, ones looking for a more futuristic, cable-free device, and other… Earlier this year I reviewed the Beats Solo 2 , the significantly improved successor to one of the world's most popular headphones. Unsurprisingly, Beats, the company you probably associate with batteries, is now one of the best headphone manufacturers around. © 2020 CNET, A RED VENTURES COMPANY. Here he test and reviews some of newest mobile, audio and camera d…. If wireless is a must, there are just too many other lower-price options out there that perform at a similar level. Search. Easily connect your headphones to a Bluetooth enabled device. The Beats Solo 2 Wireless are exactly what their name suggests. I have compared Beats Solo 2 Wireless with Bose SoundLink On Ear headphones prior to writing this review. Beats Solo2 Wireless Headphone, you can buy in cable and wirelessly, with Bluetooth’s technology, and of course in this review we will consider a wireless model, but we remind you that the structure and the materials used are the same. We may earn a commission if you click a deal and buy an item. By comparison, while the Bose SoundLink On-Ear Bluetooth wiggles around a bit when you shake your head vigorously, we all thought it offered a more comfortable fit. The Beats Solo 2 headphones take over from the Beats Solo HD, a massively popular set of on-ear headphones that has become a defining symbol of the popularisation of expensive sets. Beats on-ear Bluetooth headphone has lot going for it, but it doesn't quite justify its lofty price tag. The most important distinction is that these are Bluetooth headphones, meaning no wires, and no clutter. Beats Solo3 Wireless On-Ear Headphones - Apple W1 Headphone Chip, Class 1 Bluetooth, 40 Hours Of Listening Time - Black (Latest Model) 4.7 out of 5 stars 8,909 $119.00 $ 119 . The Beats Solo 3’s are the next evolution in on the ear headphones from the Beats family (now owned by Apple). The Beats Solo Pro headphones feature Apple’s H1 chip, which gives them better wireless performance, a few extra features, and more, as long as you use an iPhone. The Beats Solo 2 Wireless have a mid-firm headband that teams-up with a rubber-finish headband inner that keeps them glued to your head pretty well. Beats Solo 2 Wireless on the left, Beats Solo 2 wired on the right. Enjoy! Reviewed Nov 13, 2019 at 10:56 am. Leigh D. Stark June 23, 2015. and conducted this unbiased Beats Solo 3 Wireless Review. The Beats Solo 2 Wireless headphones look great, feel great and sound great. I am glad to have come across such a helpful and forthcoming computer technology blog. One caveat, though: we found they don’t suit glasses wearers all that well, the headband pressure causing a bit of discomfort if you’re going to keep the things on for an hour or more. While the Solo 2 produced more bass, instruments sounded a little more distinct on the Bose and the overall listening experience was more pleasant to our ears. The Beats Solo 2 Wireless have an above-average audio reproduction with a well-balanced bass-range that doesn't overpower the instruments and vocals. It’s a step up from the last generation, but it’s still not audiophile-style bass. While some may baulk at the $399.95 price tag, these headphones are one of those products where you’ll be thanking … My mom has the Bose SoundLink so we compared both side by side. The Beats Solo 2 Wireless cost around £100 more than the non-wireless model, and even at the lower price we were only just about capable of making peace with the Beats Solo 2’s sound quality. This has always been a style-focused brand, and that influences the box as much as it does the headphones themselves. Read honest and … Cyber Monday 2020 deals: $35 Google Home, $80 Echo Show 2-pack, $449 HP laptop, $179 Chromebook and more, Amazon Cyber Monday 2020 best deals: $300 self-emptying Roomba, $85 Nintendo Switch upgrade, $299 Sonos Move and more, Cyber Monday 2020 TV deals: Sales on smart TVs from Walmart, Best Buy, Amazon and more, A very good on-ear wireless headphone, but no bargain. CNET may get a commission from these offers. Our Verdict. And we don’t really get it here. The Solo 2 Wireless, as with all of Beats products, comes with wonderful unboxing experience. Beats' Solo3 Wireless on-ear Bluetooth headphone ($300/£250/AU$400) looks nearly identical to the Beats Solo 2 Wireless because -- on the outside at least -- Beats … Beats Solo 2 vs Solo 3: The Pros and Cons Review: Review: Beats Solo 2 Wireless headphones. The high frequencies are also not too sharp, but due to their small ear cups, they can't create a spacious soundstage. Beats Solo 2 Wireless Headphones Type – On-Ear Headphones Use – Street/Fashion Colour – White Headphones Features – Microphone Reviewer – Andrew Bistak. Beats has made sure it has fairly decent top-end clarity, though. You’ll also get the 3.5mm audio cable with inline mic and remote, a micro USB charging cable, a small carabiner clip, and of course a small sleeve with the instructions, a Beats sticker, and warranty information. The sound quality of the Beats doesn't. If it wasn’t for their instant youth associations and all-round glossy finish, this would be a design that pretty much anyone could get on with. In the gym, or out exercising where you don’t need your wits about you, they are great. A year before Apple bought the company out, Beats released a revised version of all of their headphones, most notably the Beats Studio 2.0s. The Beats Solo 2 wireless on-ear headphones feature Bluetooth connectivity for wireless use. Beats is taking its Solo line wireless, with a new set of Bluetooth cans that match the wired Solo2 almost exactly in terms of external design. Before we say anything too mean, though: the Beats Solo sound has improved hugely since the original Solo and Solo HD, sets that were pretty criminal in their price-to-sound-quality ratio. In terms of sound, there are some improvements but most of the improvements were on the wireless technology. If you’re just going to be walking about rather than running, we think you might find the Bose AE2W more comfortable. The Beats Solo 2 wireless on-ear headphones feature Bluetooth connectivity for wireless use. By What Hi-Fi? They offer noise isolation but are not noise-cancelling, unlike the more expensive Beats Studio Wireless.The Solo 2 Wireless is a step-forward for Beats. Easily connect your headphones to a Bluetooth enabled device. Beats Solo 2 Wireless Headphones Type – On-Ear Headphones Use – Street/Fashion Colour – White Headphones Features – Microphone Reviewer – Andrew Bistak. The Philips M2BT and Bose AE2W are almost £100 less, and while neither is a sound quality god, we find their sound quality issues much easier to live with at the price. Given the headband pressure, though, we find them pretty comfortable regardless. Learn More. Drop wireless and you’re in serious headphone land, populated by sets that would laugh at the Beats Solo 2 Wireless’s chops. So much of the city’s noise is a low-frequency rumble that truly accurate bass can struggle to compete with it, especially when using a headphone without active noise cancellation like this. Tested at £230. Why the downgrade? Like pretty much every other pair of Beats headphones, the wireless Solo2s will draw opinions from lovers and haters alike; you're either on board with the … What holds the Beats Solo 2 Wireless back from offering the sort of sound quality we expect at £250-plus, though, is mid-range clarity. Add together all the good bits of the Beats Solo 2 Wireless and it’s not hard to formulate a few situations where they’ll be perfect. The Beats Solo 2 Wireless is available in many colors Build. The reason for that is partly because it isn't as comfortable and partly because it doesn't sound as good. This is my quick unboxing and review of the Beats by Dr. Dre Solo2 Wireless after using them for nearly a week. Overview Prices Specs + Add to comparison. The competitor on-ear wireless headphones, Bose’s SoundLink Wireless On-ear, Sennheiser’s Momentum 2 On-ear Wireless and Plantronics Backbeat Sense, Sony WH-1000XM3, both the models of BackBeat Sense have more comfortable fit. There are multiple color options available … In this case, they become a twin of the Beats Solo 2 (without Wireless). As with all stereo Bluetooth headphones, this model has a built-in microphone for making calls, and call quality was good, though the step-up Studio Wireless has a small advantage in this department. But there are arguably better wireless headphones for the money, including the Studio Wireless. Looking just like their non-wireless brothers, the Beats Solo 2 Wireless are on-ear headphones with a more elegant, smooth design than the last generation of Beats headphones. The Beats Solo 2 headphones take over from the Beats Solo HD, a massively popular set of on-ear headphones that has become a defining symbol of the popularisation of expensive sets. The Beats Solo 2 Wireless have an above-average audio reproduction with a well-balanced bass-range that doesn't overpower the instruments and vocals. They're in the top 3 bestselling headphones and have dozens of popular alternatives in the same price range, such as Lasmex Hi-fi or Wildhorn Alta Bluetooth. en. ($380). Pulling that out you’ll get a small softshell carrying case and in there you’ll find the headphones. Putting our cynic’s hat on, Apple’s mobile devices don’t currently support apt-x and Beats is now Apple-owned. [Beats Solo 2 Wireless] don't offer that, which is a shame. Tell us what you think - send your emails to the Editor. While I found them relatively comfortable for an on-ear model, a couple of other editors in our New York offices found their fit a bit too snug (both experienced a bit of a pinching sensation). 11 February 2016. But it does lose a little something in wireless mode. However, I do prefer the fit of over-ear headphones in general, so I come into the review with a slight bias. We expect fairly good separation in a headphone at this price. The Beats Solo 2 Wireless is a well-built wireless headphone that sounds good in both wireless and wired modes and is relatively comfortable to wear for an on-ear headphone. Bisset. Aside for the colour, can you tell the difference? Beats may not have ears for every form of music, but given the music we tested with, it’s not far off, with strength in the mids and lows. The wireless tech used here isn’t going to help either. At the end of the day, my gut feeling about this headphone is that I'd rather spend the extra $80 to get the Studio Wireless, a more comfortable headphone and a notch up in terms of sound quality. Beats Solo3 Wireless On-Ear Headphones - Apple W1 Headphone Chip, Class 1 Bluetooth, 40 Hours Of Listening Time - Black (Latest Model) 4.7 out of 5 stars 8,909 $119.00 $ 119 . Its battery life is decent and has a remote control built-in to the right earcup that's easy to operate by feel. However, look at the hefty £269.99 price and just listen to them and you have a right to take issue. The Beats Solo 2 Wireless cable is not very long (about 1.4 meters), with an L-shaped plug and a remote control. It's got a slightly harsher edge and isn't quite as clean or as tight in the bass. In addition to the wireless Bluetooth connection, the headphones can also be used with a cable. If you're using an ad-blocker you might miss out on seeing the deals. The Beats Solo 2 Wireless are the cheapest wireless headphones in the Beats line-up. Aside for the colour, can you tell the difference? Shares. By What Hi-Fi? When you get into that price range, your expectations tend to go up and while you may not expect greatness, you certainly expect something close to it. For each of those you need something that is more than simply removing the wires. Read honest and … Unlike the earlier Solo models the treble is pretty well-defined. It is not a fragile product, but you wouldn’t want to drop your headphones too often, especially not when it comes with a high price tag. For each of those you need something that is more than simply removing the wires. The Beats Solo 2 Wireless cable is not very long (about 1.4 meters), with an L-shaped plug and a remote control. As for battery life, it's rated at 12 hours, which is less than what the larger Studio Wireless offers, but is still pretty decent. Tested at £230. Opening the box you’ll get the classic “change the way you hear sound” message. MSRP $199.95 PCMag editors select and review … Beats Solo Pro Wireless Headphones Review. The Good The Beats Solo 2 Wireless is a well-built wireless headphone that sounds good in both wireless and wired modes and is relatively comfortable to wear for … When I wrote my review of the Bose SoundLink On-Ear Bluetooth headphone, I said we liked the Bose a little more because the Bose offered more balanced sound with more warmth in the midrange. However, if that’s not your profile, they don’t really have the sound chops to justify the very high £269 price. Slide off the outer portion of the box, and the box that contains the headphones is That's still true for the Solo3 Wireless; they put far more emphasis on the bottom-end than Sennheiser's Momentum 2.0 Wireless, giving Estelle's "American Boy" some real bass boom. 15 min read. Not having it at this price is pretty poor. The Beats Solo3s are a vast improvement over the wireless Beats Solo2s if only for their massively improved Bluetooth range and battery life, but the approach remains mostly … The Beats Solo3 Wireless headphones (MSRP $299.99) are the newest iteration of the Beats Solo line, and along with the Powerbeats 3 earbuds, are some of the first headphones to feature Apple's W1 wireless chip.. The Beats Solo 2 Wireless headphones look great, feel great and sound great. When it's in wired mode, its sound quality falls down. Siri fanatics may want to look into the Beats Solo Pro noise cancelling on-ear headphones; otherwise, the Beats Solo3 Wireless hold up well in 2020 with just a few features showing its age. That's something the Bose can't boast. Grippy design and fuss-free wireless are great for exercise use, but sound should be better at the price. Yes, this is a smaller, less bulky headphone and some people will find its compact size appealing. But at their current price points, the Wireless Studio is arguably the better deal, even thought it's more expensive. Comparing these wireless headphones to their wired counterparts really can’t be helped because they’re essentially the same headphone in many regards, but Beats did add some tweaks to the wireless version. Leigh D. Stark June 23, 2015. The new Beats Solo Pro headphones stand out as the company’s first on-ear headphones with noise cancellation. The high frequencies are also not too sharp, but due to their small ear cups, they can't create a spacious soundstage. Review: Review: Beats Solo 2 Wireless headphones. They look good, sound good, and … The Beats Solo 2 Wireless is a headphone I’ve always been curious to try. If this is a change caused by customer feedback from the Solo 2, though, it’s perfectly likely that the non-wireless model will get this new type of foam. Tested using Methodology v1.4. They are urban headphones with a nicely close-fitting headband. While the balance here is much improved on earlier versions, detail and dynamics fall short of the best. 15 min read. Good grip, decent isolation, a folding design and wireless are all assets. MSRP $199.95 PCMag editors select and review … [Beats Solo 2 Wireless] don't offer that, which is a shame. The mids are quite soft-sounding, limiting the sense of separation. Beats Solo 2 Wireless review And the Beats go on… but these wireless Solo 2s fall just short of their rivals. If you want wireless headphones then the likelihood is you want them for a specific purpose, whether that's commuting, running or flying. Like the Solo 2, the Solo 3 is mostly made from plastic. For some inexplicable reason, Best Buy has had them on a large discount for months now. I will certainly turn to 10 Reports in the future for whenever I want to buy a tech product. As far as features go, like most Bluetooth headphones, you can stream audio from up to 30 feet (10m) away from Bluetooth-enabled devices and there are controls on the earcup to raise and lower volume, as well as take calls and skip tracks forward and back. It just sounds a little more clear and open. However, if sound quality is the top concern, you can do a lot better at the price. Testing the Beats Solo 2 Wireless with the included cable instead of wireless, there is a slight sonic improvement across the board. Follow this topic to get notifications about new stories. Categories. The competitor on-ear wireless headphones, Bose’s SoundLink Wireless On-ear, Sennheiser’s Momentum 2 On-ear Wireless and Plantronics Backbeat Sense, Sony WH-1000XM3, both the models of BackBeat Sense have more comfortable fit. They fare well enough on the London Tube. Powerful audio performance with rich bass and well-defined highs. There are even tiny battery indicator LEDs to let you know how much of the 12-hour battery you have left. These headphones sound very similar, virtually identical when used with a cable – which you can do, should the battery run out. It’s enjoyable. Like the Solo 2, the Solo 3 is mostly made from plastic. It is not a fragile product, but you wouldn’t want to drop your headphones too often, especially not when it comes with a high price tag. I … Working in tandem with the fairly head-gripping qualities of the original version, Bluetooth makes the Beats Solo 2 Wireless one of the best sets around for runners and gym addicts. The sound is not really hifi stuff in some respects, though. Leigh D. Stark June 23, 2015. But, the Beats Solo 2 headphones from Dr. Dre removes this problem. The Beats Solo2 Wireless comes in blue, black, red and white. Can be used in wired, passive mode. Find out which is better and their overall performance in the headphones ranking. However, the sound isn’t reduced to the bassy fog that you might have hears Beats-haters talking about. Beats says that it also improved the Solo 2 with a wider range of sound, which may be true when comparing them to the Solo HD, however, the Solo 2 have a narrow soundstage when compared to one of our favorite headphones - the Audio-Technica ATH-M50x. Jennifer This streams audio at a lower quality, and with greater latency. Beats Solo 2 are a well-known option on the higher end of the price range. One of the more impressive elements of the Beats Solo 2 Wireless is how subtly wireless has been integrated. 15 min read. However, the choice is personal. Find helpful customer reviews and review ratings for Beats Solo 2 Wireless On-Ear Headphone - Red (Renewed) at Amazon.com. Beats Solo 3 Wireless Review [ On-Ear Headphone] [Bluetooth] Today I decided to write a review of the Beats solo 3 wireless (199$) – excellent wireless headphones with one of the best sounds ever.So Let’s Do Beats solo 3 wireless Review. I liked the Solo 2 and think it's one of the better on-ear headphones that costs about $200 (£170, AU$260), although it helps if you appreciate a zippier, more "exciting" sound profile. Review: Review: Beats Solo 2 Wireless headphones. But, the Beats Solo 2 headphones from Dr. Dre removes this problem. One of the biggest hassles of wearing headphones is the cord. The good The Beats Solo 2 Wireless is a well-built wireless headphone that sounds good in both wireless and wired modes and is relatively comfortable to wear for an on-ear headphone. Beats Solo 2 Wireless review And the Beats go on… but these wireless Solo 2s fall just short of their rivals. A set of LED lights on the earcups act as a battery life indicator and you can also see how much battery you have via an indicator on your phone or tablet. 00 $199.95 $199.95 It’s about as neat as wireless headphones get while packing-in all the control we’re after. Yes, it's more travel friendly, but it also isn't as light as some competing on-ear headphones, such as the $250, £220, AU$329 Bose SoundLink On-Ear Bluetooth (the Bose is lighter by about 2.2 ounces or 62 grams). Despite being a powered headphone, the Beats Solo 2 Wireless don’t offer any form of active noise cancellation, but their passive “dumb” isolation is easily good enough to contend with public transport. It's also worth mentioning that because Beats Solo 2 Wireless offers a very snug fit -- the headphones do stay securely on your head, even while running -- they end up pressing down on your ears somewhat firmly. 9. The Beats Solo 3’s are the next evolution in on the ear headphones from the Beats family (now owned by Apple). Unlike other sites, we thoroughly test every product we review. The advantage of Solo3 is its classic Beats design and attractive finish on the headphone exterior. The new Beats Solo2 Wireless headphones (MSRP $299.95) are the Bluetooth-powered, wire-optional version of the company's signature Solo series, and the follow-up to the Beats Solo2 on-ear headphones from a couple years ago. Browse Solo2 Wireless headphones support and customer service topics at BeatsbyDre.com. Conclusion. Fans of booming low-end won't be disappointed by the Beats Solo 2 headphones' powerful bass and distortion-free audio performance. In terms of sound, there are some improvements but most of the improvements were on the wireless technology. Like the non-wireless Solo 2, these headphones use fake leather pads, although following a side-by-side comparison it does seem Bose has chosen to use ever-so-slightly softer, lower-density foam in this model. The on-ear headphones offers both wired and wireless functionality with an included 3.5mm RemoteTalk cable. This is my quick unboxing and review of the Beats by Dr. Dre Solo2 Wireless after using them for nearly a week. They prioritise a secure fit over all-out comfort, though. 15 min read. The vast array of Features of the Beats Studio Wireless is easily the greatest strength of these headphones, which I think a lot of people overlook and instead only focus on sound performance. The Dr Dre Beats Solo 2 Wireless headphones ticks all the boxes when it comes to wireless freedom, design, build and audio quality. In fact, as I said, it's quite good in a lot of ways. In this case, they become a twin of the Beats Solo 2 (without Wireless). The Beats Solo 2 Wireless do not support apt-x, the higher-grade Bluetooth codec designed to avoid some of the sound quality issues of Bluetooth audio. There are no battery compartments or ugly buttons  to deal with. Like most wireless sets, they use Bluetooth streaming to help you banish one very important cable from your life. That may not sound like an achievement, but the last set we reviewed, the Philips M2BT, we fairly prone to such glitches. Beats Solo 2 are $30.10 more expensive than the average headphones ($49.99). Find helpful customer reviews and review ratings for Beats Solo 2 Wireless On-Ear Headphone - Red (Renewed) at Amazon.com. 00 $199.95 $199.95 The design is careful about spreading force across the entire earpad, doing its best to avoid earache. The bass is a bit flabby and ill-disciplined. The bad Expensive; doesn't sound quite as good as the Bose SoundLink On-Ear Bluetooth, which costs $50 less. In addition to the wireless Bluetooth connection, the headphones can also be used with a cable. 10 Reports has full five stars on my behalf. When it comes to sound quality, Beats means Bass. They use an integrated lithium battery, charged using a Micro USB port on the right cup. The Beats logo and the ring around it on the left cup take on the role of a three-button remote. Wireless performance was entirely flawless, something we don’t often get to say about wireless headphones. Beats says that it also improved the Solo 2 with a wider range of sound, which may be true when comparing them to the Solo HD, however, the Solo 2 have a narrow soundstage when compared to one of our favorite headphones - the Audio-Technica ATH-M50x. Always has, (probably) always will. Once again, the Beats Solo 2 Wireless is well-suited to urban environments and noisy gyms. Sony WH-1000XM3 lays claim to top noise-canceling headphone, Top noise-cancelling headphones take it up just a notch, These wireless headphones beat out AirPods on sound quality, The king of truly wireless earphones is crowned with small enhancements, By However, the choice is personal. Beats Solo 2 vs Solo 3: The Pros and Cons The output sounds of the old and the new model does not vary. If you want wireless headphones then the likelihood is you want them for a specific purpose, whether that's commuting, running or flying. To be clear, that doesn't mean the Beats Solo 2 is a bad headphone. Its battery life is decent and has a remote control built-in to the right earcup that's easy to operate by feel. It's very good for a Bluetooth headphone, but it doesn't reach the "excellent" level of the Apple-owned brand's bigger and more expensive brother, the Studio Wireless . We never, ever accept money to review a product. Leigh D. Stark June 23, 2015. They have long been renowned in the audiophile community for having poor sound quality and a ridiculous high price. We procured the Beats Solo 3 wireless headphones on our own (they were on sale…yay!) Beats and Apple have teamed up to give us the Beats Solo Pros. There’s a tiny power button on this cup too, but all the other buttons are cleverly hidden in the Beats Solo 2 Wireless’s design. 9. The Beats Solo 2 Wireless are pleasant-sounding headphones with the bass skew that’s become virtually synonymous with the brand. One of the biggest hassles of wearing headphones is the cord. That compactness has some advantages. Andrew Williams is a technology writer, who has contributed to Stuff, WIRED, TechRadar, T3, Wareable and, of course, Trusted Reviews. If you own Solo2 and want to upgrade that means you pay for extra cell life and signals. The bottom line Beats on-ear Bluetooth headphone has lot going for it, but it doesn't quite justify its lofty price tag. I … Conclusion. This is a lighter headphone than the Studio Wireless and folds and stows away in a smaller carrying case. They sound nice, sure, but you pay top dollar for middleweight sound here. Beats may not have ears for every form of music, but given the music we tested with, it’s not far off, with strength in the mids and lows. I have compared Beats Solo 2 Wireless with Bose SoundLink On Ear headphones prior to writing this review. I also reiterated that the Beats Solo 2 Wireless is a strong Bluetooth headphone -- and its faster sound may suit some listeners' musical tastes better -- but we came away liking the sound of the Bose a little more. Comfortable design. Fans of booming low-end won't be disappointed by the Beats Solo 2 headphones' powerful bass and distortion-free audio performance. Beats by Dre Solo 2 Review - Preface Few things are more polarising to audiophiles and headphone enthusiasts than the mention of Beats by Dre headphones. Shares. The Beats Solo 2 Wireless are a patchwork of good and bad. Well, for starters, the price. Beats Solo 2 Wireless on the left, Beats Solo 2 wired on the right. Browse Solo2 Wireless headphones support and customer service topics at BeatsbyDre.com.

beats solo 2 wireless review

Rug Hooking Kits, Biscuits Packaging Design, Scheepjes Whirl Jumpin Jelly, Difference Between Red And White Phosphorus, Telewizja Polska Canada Inc, Simply Nature Organic Vanilla Soymilk, Spice Names In Arabic, Rockwell Condensed Bold, Preston B Nichols Interview, Ivy Background Clipart, Zinus 7 Inch Smart Box Spring, King,